Can You Have A Successful Relationship While Chasing Your Dreams?

This is a question and topic I've seen people ask, use as an excuse for their distance or frustration, or because they truly believe that there's only one way to achieve your goals. They say that the best way to avoid being distracted from your true path is to focus on that, and that alone. Well, I'm here to tell you - that is wrong. 

Read More

Detroit Artists: 'Pay For Play' Isn't The Way



By: Amy Cooper, ACRONYM

I understand in the world of putting on art shows, or any show for that matter - you have to pay for the venue and cover the cost of things. And that makes sense, but to a degree. I've done my fair share of entering shows, $50 here, $25 here to cover my booth fee. And I've constantly looked into shows like DIY Ferndale, Dally In The Alley, and even smaller hometown spots like Founders Festival in Farmington, and found that the booth prices are super steep. Unless you're making bank at a full time job aside from your art, you're more than likely not going to be able to get a booth at one of the bigger events unless you split one with 4+ artists. 

Credit: The Oatmeal

Credit: The Oatmeal

The "Exposure" Argument: For artists, the word exposure is a disgusting word. It used to be a good thing, and sometimes it still can be applicable (higher up magazine names and clothing lines), but as artists who try to make a living off of what we do, or to make money as a side business with our work, exposure is a huge slap in the face. We can't pay bills with exposure. I work a 40 hour a week job, and I work very hard. I took a second job to make extra cash. But here's my thing: I pay for my equipment. I pay for my computer. My internet to network. My lenses. My prints. All of that to be a respected artist in the community that can offer a solid service to people who seek it. 

I very rarely want to come out to throw someone under the bus, but as the masses have voiced there concerns over weeks, and months - there's one thing I want to spell out for the artists of the Detroit community: Unless you make major money, or you have a ton of friends who are willing to spend a tank of gas on an art show for you, enlisting in RAW Detroit is not the way to go. I hate having to name names, so if a representative of RAW Detroit is reading this - please hear me out, because there are TONS of artists who are completely disgusted and fed up with your process, and this is why they aren't enrolling in your system. 

The experience overall sounded like a dream come true: an art collective that will back you to break into other markets like Chicago and LA, and a chance to show off our collective works as a unit for the sake of exposure to other people's friends. That sounds wonderful, until you note that you have to sell 20 tickets for $20 a piece to be able to participate, and if you don't sell your quota, you have to cover that cost yourself. That's $400. Now, I promote, and I promote hard. And I still only managed to sell 4 tickets a week or two before the deadline. I could not be responsible for a $400 booth fee, essentially, to showcase my work. And I'm pretty sure most artists can't either. 

I'm writing this today, because not only have I had other friends drop out of the show prior to the date because they couldn't sell enough tickets or couldn't afford the fees, but I was reading today in a Facebook post from another artist, in which he's now been requested multiple times. Many of the Detroit art circle has commented since - and we're all saying the same thing: It's a pyramid scheme, it's a rip off, and it's not worth it to Detroit artists to join in. 

Beginner artists cannot afford this, nor can artists who have real life expectations. Even if we were able to sell 20 tickets for $10 a pop, that's still an expensive fee for one person to handle, even if the payout is barely breaking even. We'd just assume throwing our own show and putting money towards a venue, one that's not sponsored by any showcase, and where the money comes directly back to us, rather than funding someone else's art show or lacing someone else's pockets.

Now, to play Devil's advocate, some Fashion people were able to get their clothes in front of a group by doing RAW, but at the same time, spending that much money on a gamble is hard to throw in unless you do have the money to do so. And the justification is this: when you place yourself in a show, you may sell a ton, or you may sell nothing.

I've only sold maybe $50 tops at a show, and my work is not bad. Sometimes it's your location, or who's at the show. If you have a ton of people at a show not looking to carry around a 16x20 framed print around, or don't need any art and just want to look at it, or you're at a clothing sponsored show and a bunch of teenagers show up who aren't willing to throw down $100+ on a painting, you're not going to succeed. So a $400 covered booth? That's not going to do anything for anyone, except maybe eat up their entire paycheck.

I'm not trying to bash you, RAW Detroit. Or any other group that does this - but I'm hoping as an open letter to all of you, be realistic about the expectations. Realize that you're getting B or C rated artists to pay in, rather than the more driven-successful-hustlers of the Detroit Art Scene. We'll find a way to showcase ourselves on our own in which we're benefited, not some third hand that gets almost half a $1K out of the artists that show up. We're better off doing it by ourselves... Which might be the Detroit frame of mind, but we're used to pulling ourselves up on our own, thank you very much. 




Why You Should Always Research The Photographer You Work With




By: Amy Cooper, ACRONYM

If you follow some of my artful opinion blogs from over the years, you know that I am a person who's always urging women to be comfortable while shooting, but also, to guard themselves when it comes to who they take their clothes off for. 

First thing's first: Women empower themselves in different ways. I shared a meme on my personal media the other day that had the sentiment that women can empower themselves with nudity, or they can be modest, and it's not your job to tell her which is okay. This is completely true, and there's no space for slut shaming here. 

People have called my thoughts or "preaching" on guarding yourselves against male photographers in the past a little overboard, and some have gotten very defensive in regards to it, the whole "I'm not a creep," "you make male photographers look dangerous," that whole thing. And it's true - some male photographers are great, and super professional, but some are not. And some will make you feel like you're in danger. 

Exhibit A:
This news report from FOX 2 about Anthony Raphael Perales, who claims to have a modeling agency to people, as well as runs his photography studio. Some of the accounts are very chilling, including women who have taken nudes with him, and that now he's labeling his company as "Latin Mass Society" and many women he's photographed have been asked to wear white veils.

Dubbing his page the "Michigan's #1 Premier Exclusive Modeling Agency," some of the women that have come forward have noted that some of his practices seemed fetish based, and his "studio" was actually a storage barn at his house. 

The report notes that one of the women that came forward said he wanted to do a Nazi inspired shoot. She initially thought he was kidding, according to the article. No such luck, he's been posting anti-Semitic messages and photos of Adolph Hitler, and him with guns. When contacted by FOX 2, he referred to himself as a National Socialist, as in Nazi Germany, but in America.

Now, obviously, this is an extreme case. But here are a few things to consider, and what you should look out for when you are booking a photographer, or agreeing to work with someone on a "time for pictures," AKA "TFP" shoot: 

1. Their Social Media Footprint:

Do they have a page? How many followers do they have? Do they have any fans that are your friends? If the models (who I'm totally not blaming for their lack of research) would have looked up his pages, he has 19 fans on Seroptics Models Incorporated.  His second, however, has 2,000+ as The Order of Saint Mary Magdalene, however does show political and religious rhetoric. 

2. Their Website:

Does it look reputable? Once again, using Perlas as an example, no, it does not. It sends up many red flags, including saying that he's an award winner, but no awards noted on

3. View their work:

Does their portfolio exude what you'd hope to be portrayed as? Do you like their editing style? Their concepts? If you're finding that they support or photograph things a certain way, like for example, poorly shot nudes, raunchy photos that you wouldn't dare post on social media, or views of hatred, you should probably not work with them. 

As I said, this was a special case, in which things went completely in a different direction, but it's not the first time that a guy has used photography as a front for his own agenda. And I'm not trying to bad mouth the male photographers out there, but as a woman, it's in your best interest to research, and even reach out to friends who may have worked with the photographer to see how they behave.

Exhibit B: Model Testimonials
So far, some of the upsets I've heard in confidence include: 

- Telling the model that in their mind, they are pretending they are their girlfriend to produce content that is passionate. 
- Pressuring a model to take off their clothes when they did not desire that type of shoot. 
- Not giving them a clear indicator of what they wanted out of a shoot, and then becoming enraged when they don't follow through on a plan you're not comfortable with. 
- Requesting to meet privately and holding a stipulation that you cannot bring another person with you to the shoot or meeting. 
- Requesting to pick you up at your residence. 
- Hitting on you, making sexual comments, or asking for sex in exchange for pictures.

Now, some photographers request if they are doing "sexy shoots," "boudoir shoots" etc that you do not bring your significant other, but honestly, if you're not comfortable shooting with a male photographer without your significant other present, and that's the "photographer's rules," then find another photographer. A photographer's job is to make you feel comfortable while shooting. 

Never put yourself in a situation where you are in private with a complete stranger that you don't have knowledge about. If you are to meet with a photographer, meet them in public. Get to know them. Make sure that your gut checks out and that they aren't exuding any creepy behavior before you shoot. 

And ladies, please: If a male photographer is hitting on you, put an end to it right then and there. Even if you want the shoot - your self respect is way more important, and find someone who respects you, your body, and your work. 

Always do your research. Be informed about who you're working with and what nature their photography presents, and if anyone tells you that you're being over-paranoid, do not listen to them. You may not be put in the positions illustrated here, but I guarantee that others have. 

You Don't Have To Be A Size Zero To Be Beautiful

Now, I'll be the first to admit that when I look at myself, I'm not the hugest fan. I believe that partially, being a Photographer and a Woman can cause a lot of non-positivism when it comes to my body. I know what I'd edit on me in Photoshop, because I Photoshop things off people every time I shoot. 

The thing is, though there are many women who are afraid or uncomfortable being the size that they are, or comparing themselves to models or Instagram "models" that they see every day, the important thing to note is everyone is beautiful in their own way

I know I have cited Ashley Graham, the model, more than once while writing about photography, but she's done another photo shoot that has made headlines, one in which she's got on a bra, but no underwear, and is kissing a man in a stairwell. 

Now typically, this would be something that many guys would think "Ok, put some clothes on honey, you're not skinny enough for that." But what's great about Ashley is she doesn't give a rats ass. She knows she's hot. And she owns it.

Many of us don't have that same confidence level, but hear me out: No matter what size you are, how big your nose is, how thick your thighs are, or how small your boobs are: YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL. We need to preach this more to our women, that way we can uplift each other. Not to mention, the better and more confident we are when it comes out our bodies, the more art we can create with REAL PEOPLE, not a computer generated fallacy.  

Funding Faux Pas: Patreon V. GoFundMe And Other Kickstarters

By: Amy Cooper

One thing that many artists have to grapple with is cost. It is a constant struggle that many of us tackle, trying to find a way to get paid for what we do on top of selling work or services. Especially if we are creating things to show our talents, many of us sink a lot of money into our projects without return. 

One of the things, especially us photographers struggle with is updating equipment. Now, there are many things out there that are kickstarter programs, the most notably being GoFundMe. Now, here's the thing that you need to understand about platforms like this: 

You are literally posting on your social media to have other people fund your goal or dream without giving them anything in return. 

And you may not like my response to this, but doing that is wrong. It is not anyone's responsibility to pay for your equipment or your education. Especially if you're already owning or operating a business of this same craft. Asking people to pay for your equipment would be the equivalent of standing in a store and yelling "Hey, can you each give me $5 so I can put it toward my groceries?"

On a respect component, many of us have worked for our equipment. Now a select few newbies maybe had Mommy and Daddy to help, but most of us earned our glass by working hard, taking jobs we didn't necessarily like, and building our arsenals. I should know, I've done it with two camera brands now. 

So when it comes to something like Patreon, I can say so far, I'm a little more lenient, and here's why: With Patreon, you are (supposedly) offering goods, services, discounts, or otherwise something as a response for someone to support you. You're saying "Hey, for X amount of dollars / X amount of dollars a month, you will get the following things: A, B, C, D." 

For example, many Suicide Girls or photographers who post more X-Rated Sets will make a tier for that, and have people pay to see those images. Some will send out images per month in print form, while some will offer seminars or even simple social media follows (for those big named artists). Namely, you are getting something in return for your patronage. 

Though that may help you get to your goal as well, and it's a lot more work than a GoFundMe where you just beg for someone to support you, at least they are getting content, goods, or services by using Patreon to support your craft. And let's face it, many of us post our work for free online to show off what we can do, but not many will offer to put their money where their mouth is. 

So, if you're considering using either service, let me ask you this: Are you the type of person that wants to have everything handed to them and not give anyone anything back in return (a taker), or do you want to be a business person and give people goods, skills, and art to view for supporting your craft? You decide. 

What are your thoughts on this post? Feel free to sound off in the comments or share this post!

Like my articles? Come Support Me On Patreon!

Fat Girl, Curvy Girl, Real Girl Vs. Photoshop, Fantasy, and Expectations

By: Amy Cooper, ACRONYM

It's no mistake that when you look out at a slew of magazines that you'll see smooth, skinny, gorgeous models adorning them. Sex sells, and looking plastic will sell whatever you want as long as there is a hot girl attached. 

Some media outlets feature a "hot babe a day" picture, and there are many Instagram accounts devoted to nude, partially nude, and suggestively nude women. And hell, at this point, there are more women (mostly young females) locally who are willing to take off their clothes for the camera if it means becoming "a model." 

The industry creates a picture for women that if you're not thin, you're not worth it. It may not come out and say it outright, but every advertisement, account, and ideology of a "sexy woman" stems from what the media shares and is considered beautiful. 

Now, I have been told recently that we are in a "fat girl renaissance" and women with "real curves" are also being worshiped, but in the industry that I have chosen to work with and in, it's a hard one considering that I am a woman. 

I take model photographs, fashion photographs, boudoir, and implied photography, so I've seen it all. I've seen the curves, imperfections, cellulite, and puckers on every model. Then when it gets to the internet, it most likely has been requested to be removed, or it is common practice to remove it. 

"Make me thinner," they say. "I don't want to have pores." And it's the best kept secret to the men who don't pay attention, that every woman has one variation or more of the imperfections they are hoping to erase through photography. They don't realize it until later, when they are in the presence of a real, living, breathing woman: stretchmarks and all. 

Now, a field such as photography, it is male dominated - as in, mostly males are the shooters. I know few women who reach out to models and women to take these types of photos, but when we as women take on a field like this, we want you to feel sexy.

What people fail to realize is behind closed doors, it can become tormenting knowing that you're feeding a beast that you yourself are being attacked by: that you have to look a certain way to be considered beautiful. You'll find more women photographers hiding behind the camera rather than in front of it, because they don't feel they measure up to the women they are photographing, even if we are the ones manipulating the canvas with the blur and clone stamp tools.  

There are models out there now in mainstream, such as Ashley Graham, who are considered "big girls" or plus size models, and those give us hope that beauty isn't one size fits all, but as we listen to men idolizing women who are a size zero, we know it's not a full on shift in taste (though there are a few men out there that really do want a *real woman, flaws and all*). 

And finally, in the age of social media, there are so many women willing to strip for the camera. Women who are being worshiped by their friends and fans who don't realize what they "really look like" because they are not more than a computer manipulated version of themselves. 

They look at stripping down as a sense of "empowerment" or find it invigorating. Whether it's for themselves, or secretly for attention, it's beyond us, but the main point is this: 9 times out of 10, what photographers are told to peddle, the silky smooth, perfect skin, and tweaked bodies to meet magazine standards, everyone needs to remember that "magazine standard" isn't realistic

I am a huge supporter of women being happy and healthy, and to be themselves, and even though I will comply to a request from a client to look a certain way, I do believe that the real you is the best you. Let's hope that one day, as time goes on, that there's a "realism" renaissance bigger than what is out there now, so young girls don't grow up the way we did, thinking that the only way to be desirable is to have a flat belly, zero imperfections, and that they aren't worth it if they are real. 

Photoshop: The Constant Discussion

By: Amy Cooper, ACRONYM

As a photographer, I hear it constantly:

"Can you make me skinnier?"
"Can you photoshop my pimples?"
"Make sure my stretch marks don't show."
"Just make me pretty, okay?"

Though I'm not going to combat or say that photographers are wrong for doing so (because they are not for providing what the client wants),  it's important to be aware that we are all human, and I have to be a person of truth, so I'm sharing this (albeit grammar stricken) post about Photoshopping women's bodies (or even men's for that matter) and the expectations it gives perspective partners. 

When doing any sort of photography, whether it be portraiture, boudoir, family portraits, modeling, I will always try to make the person look good without taking too much heritage from the individual. Heritage is important - and what I mean by the word "heritage" is the things that you need to have on you to make you more YOU. But more importantly, I want you to be happy with you, and for you to feel beautiful or handsome.

For example, I work with this model occasionally. I know what she looks like down to any stretch marks on her thigh to the creases in her forehead. Now, I've lightened the creases in her forehead to a degree, but it also lays groundwork for THAT being her characteristics. I, of course, will remove stretch marks or any imperfections of puckers, bumps, scrapes, and scars, but I try to keep anything semi-natural in tact. 


With that in mind, I have seen portraits of this same individual from other photographers, and she doesn't look anything like herself with some of the editing that has been implied. Hey, we're all human here, in case I have to remind you (unless of course, you are an alien, to which I say "thanks for reading, inter-galactic space ranger!). There is no reason to delete the natural stamps that make someone have characteristics and life markers.

People do have wrinkles, stretchmarks, dimples, fat rolls, jelly arms, an ugly mole, yellow teeth, strange hair in places where it doesn't belong, and resting bitch face. All of these things are normal. Seeing posts from people having to point out stretchmarks and other forms of imperfections happens more so these days because when it comes to sexual intimacy, we're told that it's "not sexy" or "attractive" to have fat, to have cellulite, stretch marks, any of that. 

Even though I don't agree with the post that it doesn't make you a REAL MAN if you don't want this jelly (*Dances to Destiny's Child*), humans are humans. Not everyone's going to be perfect. No matter what, when people (particularly women, but sometimes men) take off their clothes, each has an imperfection, or several. Nobody looks like an airbrushed model when they are on their back. So look at it this way, if you want a photoshopped version of a person to stare at, then you're going to have to pick up Sports Illustrated (considering Playboy no longer publishes nudes.)

Food for thought, and as always, peace and love. There's no malice here with these notations. 


VIDEO: I'm An Instagram Husband

By: Amy Cooper, ACRONYM

Though photographers use Instagram or have clients who use their photos on Instagram, I'm sure none of us can help laughing at this video. The mock commercial by The Mystery Hour documents how hard it is to be an "Instagram Husband" that  is constantly shooting photos of their "wives" on Instagram.

Some of the best lines include: 

"Behind every cute girl on Instagram is a guy like me... and a brick wall."

"I'm basically a human selfie stick."

"We take so long to get anywhere because we're taking pictures of our feet."

"We used to eat our food... Now we just take pictures of it."

Though it's highly satirical, we all know people who do this, or have done this. Remember to live your life not for the internet, folks! 


A How-To Guide On Respecting Your Photographer

By: Amy Cooper, ACRONYM

Photography is a business. It's a service rendered. It's work, time, effort, deteriorating eyesight, back breaking, and cartilage erosion type work. Ask my chiropractor, I'm pretty messed up. 

But here's the thing - for some reason, Photographers tend to not get respected quite as much as other business owners. At one point, we had all come into the field as apprentices, learning the tricks of the trade, and yes, taking free shoots and opportunities. But toward a moment where someone goes from learning the craft to beginning their businesses, there is a fine line where people begin to take advantage of someone because of their talent. 

We have equipment that we spend thousands of dollars on, nights that we blow off our family and friends to edit, and physically, mentally, and emotionally work on the photos (and videos) that we produce for you to get the result you deserve as a client. 

So I came across these embed posts below on Social Media, and felt it was necessary to not only share with my clients and potential clients, but also for the other people in my feed in hopes of being able to express themselves in a thorough manner without coming off like a total jerkface. Yes, that is a technical term.


The equipment that we buy tends to come out of our own pockets. We spend LITERALLY thousands of dollars trying to stock ourselves up, whether it be high quality lenses, computers, the best camera body to do quality work, locations that need to be rented, lighting to be purchased, and more. So when you ask someone to do free photography for you, or demand a discount, you are personally devaluing our work. Some of us take it very seriously, and especially if you are a friend of ours, it probably makes us feel as if you devalue our friendship, on top of our work. 

We also are granted the right for artistic licence when you hire us as a photographer. If a specific photo didn't end up in your batch, it probably did not come out the way it was intended when shot. We don't like releasing work that we aren't pleased with over-all, so asking us for the RAW files or asking if you can get a discount if you edit them yourself is also a pretty low blow. 


This one I am a little bit more flexible on because I tell all my clients that every photo that I get that is good is what they will receive. Other photographers will occasionally limit the photographs that they will produce and it will be stipulated in a contract. When you agree to the terms with a photographer at the time of hire, you cannot demand more things after the fact. This is why you should always communicate with your photographer/videographer on what it is that you want, every single detail. 


There is a big difference between a professional and a novice, and when you hire one, you should know the difference. I happen to have been on the end of quite a few times where I had been taken advantage of due to kind nature in terms of giving away free photography, instead of demanding what I deserve as a professional. Now, I won't stand on a pedestal, but I use this money that I generate from shoots to create and add to my business. Though there are people more well off than someone like me, and can afford to throw thousands of dollars at the project in one shot - many of us are using the money that you give us for the internet at our homes or studios (to upload your photos), lighting (to light the space/studio), electricity (to continue our edits) and all the equipment we buy to keep your project looking ship shape. So please, don't ask for free photography. 

The edit to this process is that sometimes photographers do have to take projects for little to no money to get "exposure" - and it's up to the photographer's decision to choose what is worthy of that. Family Portraits, Weddings, Ect. are not exposure type situations, so please don't try to sell us that as your reasoning. Fashion however, that can be a grey area, but is ultimately up to the photographer's preferences.


This one is a little difficult during the age of social media, especially in the terms of Facebook and Instagram. If you have to position a photo in a certain spot and the watermark is removed, ask your photographer if that's okay. I get clients who text me and ask me prior to posting all the time. I also will ask them if they do something like that, to @ tag my business page on Facebook or use my Instagram @ to give me photo credit - both with cropped and not cropped items. Anytime someone sees that logo on someone's photo, that gives them a reason to check out our business on top of showing off our gorgeous work. Sure, sounds a little vain, but we love being bragged about. 


On top of all the other things I do with my business, I've trained a few models in the art of social media and how to be respectful. When someone presents them with photos, I've had to stop them from putting Instagram filters over the photos. 

The thing about adding extra filters and doing edits to the photos we present you is that it's not a proper depiction of our work. Not to sound anywhere near condescending, but you didn't study how to make a great photograph, we did. So adding X-Pro II or Valencia over a photo we've already crafted for you is a slap in the face to our design. At the end of the day, if you paid for the photos, then it's yours to decide, but it's really not something we enjoy seeing when you do end up crediting us on social. 


I will quote my good friend/client Jessica here - because she won't mind. I made mention before in one of my semi-rants about photographers who say "Don't hire your friends, hire me" as a sales tactic. I felt that it was a hit, mostly because I do have quite a few clients that are also my friends. She told me (and I'm paraphrasing) that she wouldn't have hired me if she didn't love my work. 

It wasn't a benefit of cost effectiveness (see the part about not asking a friend to shoot for you to get a discount), but because after family portraits, newborns, Christmas pictures, and her wedding on the way, she actually loves my art and creativity that I pour into the work I do for her. Please don't hire your friends if you don't love their work. A - it will be hell on the both of you because neither of you will be satisfied, and B - it may also put a strain on your friendship in the long run. If you love their work - then by all means, show them by hiring them... for real - because you believe in their work. 


With my business, I try to be as well rounded as possible, and I pretty much will take any challenge you can throw at me, but not everyone is as versatile. If someone is a specific type of photographer, whether it be event, wedding, landscape, newborn, fashion, or boudoir, you want to make sure you know the niche and the capabilities of your photographer before hiring them. You wouldn't hire a landscape artist to photograph your baby, or hire a club photographer to shoot your wedding. If you are a more versatile artist, or are willing to try, always let your client know up front that even if you don't quite know how to do it - you're willing to try and deliver. Otherwise, don't be a self-absorbed photo-snob, wing it, and then ultimately bomb the project. 


As photographers who constantly have to self promote, we feel a little vain at times. Notice me, Senpai! But the fact of the matter is, if you're going to post or repost some of our work, please, please, PLEASE give us credit on Social Media. A good deal of us get our clientele this way. We tend to present photographs on social with watermarks (see above), and we'd prefer to give you a watermarked image, but even if we don't, either link back to our social spaces, or at least put our company name in your post. We appreciate it more than you realize, and it helps us continue business from word of mouth... er... keyboards. 


This is just common courtesy. If you need a photographer, hire one. Don't ask your friend to come to an event, and then say "Oh, could you bring your camera?" If your friends are as passionate about their jobs as some of mine are, you could very well not be friends very much longer.

Same goes for not explaining clearly what you're looking for when you are getting work done by a photographer or videographer. Don't say you need just a couple portraits done, and then take up 3 hours of their time, bringing them there under false pretenses.


This is by far the WORST thing you could say to a photographer or videographer. Yes, we spend thousands of dollars on great camera equipment - we know, we pay for it. But that doesn't mean that is what makes our images.

There is a battle in the artistic community that is torn between the camera making the person, and the person making the camera. There is something to be explained with this battle: It's like saying that guns kill people, not the people who are wielding the guns. We control the camera. We shoot the images. We compose the shot. We have the creative and artistic vision. So when you get a product from us, it's what we see as we craft the image.

Now, not every photographer is like this, sometimes it's really their camera that is doing all the work, and they are just pointing and shooting. But if you're getting a genuinely good image, the camera can't do that job on it's own. So don't insult us by saying it's the piece of equipment, it's just the tool we use to create your art. 

I hope you got some great ideas and information out of this post, and feel free to share on social media, whether it be to clients or friends. Thanks for reading! 

Special thanks to the Photographers Jacksonville Facebook Page for drafting these images and sharing them on social media. 

Instagram No Longer Forcing Crop-To-Square

By: Amy Cooper, Acronym Creative Studio

There is no longer a reason to say "Oh, I had to crop your logo off my photo to make it fit my profile picture" or "Instagram wouldn't let me keep it there," because now Instagram will be updating it's app to support full photo sharing. 

The squares will still be allowed, but if you're having a professional photo done and it has a watermark, most of us would love you keeping our watermark there, because hey, that's how we get more business and following. 

So, we speak for the rest of the photographers out there when we say "IT'S ABOUT TIME, INSTAGRAM!"  The change is said to be migrating as we speak, so it's only a matter of the next few days that we should have the new versions. 

Now we will be able to delete some of the apps we have like Square-Sized and #Square, because it's all in one.

Now, if they would only make toggling between accounts easier by setting it up like Twitter...

Create Amazing Pictures With Your Smartphone!


There’s no secret that we love sharing photos. With Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter right at our fingertips, we not only want to create gorgeous “photography like” shots of our kids, our friends, and our family, but we want to do it without buying a fancy camera. 

Though you can’t get pro-photography from a cell phone (though they love to claim you can), the semi-pro photographer in me wants to share some awesome tips for taking shots with your phone, and turning them into pieces of awesome artwork.

With this you will need the following:
– A Smartphone:
It doesn’t matter whether you’ve got an iPhone or a DROID, if you’ve upgraded your phone in the past year or two, you probably have an awesome camera on your phone. 

A Good Amount of Light:

Dark and dim places tend to make things grainy, and honestly, using the cell phone flash looks pretty darn terrible. Find a spot with a good amount of light and shoot your initial image there. 

– A Steady Hand:
Because you don’t have a high end SLR inside your phone, you will have to be sort of steady. The shutter speed isn’t all that quick on phones, and this is why you see a lot of celebrity drunk selfies come out all wobbly looking.

Okay, now that you’ve got that covered and you’ve shot your images, here’s a little segment I like to call “Post Production/Cheating”:

Similar to how photographers will edit pictures, here’s some awesome applications that I even use on occasion to work on photos from my phone: 

Adobe Lightroom – Available in iTunes App Store and Google Play
Lightroom is one of the premiere programs that photographers will use, along with Photoshop as the “big guns.” Lightroom is free with subscription to Adobe’s Creative Cloud program, which will run you about $9.99 a month for a computer version of a Photoshop/Lightroom bundle. So if you take a lot of photos that you load into the computer with a camera, then that might be a good thing to pick up. 

You can do mostly everything a photographer can do using the Lightroom App, and here’s a couple shots, directly from my smartphone to show you some of those tricks:


If $9.99 doesn’t fit into your budget, fear not, I’ve got a few more tricks up my sleeve! 

VSCOcam – Available in iTunes App Store and Google Play
This program has similar effects, and personally I enjoy this a little more than I do the Lightroom App. Excuse the selfie, but here’s one of me I did with an iPhone, with the right amount of light (very very important!). You can add filters, similar to Instagram, but to full frame photos, and not a diss to Instagram, but VSCO has some awesome filters that you won’t see in their square. You can also change the tone, saturation, vignette the corners, or add fade to a photo to tone it down some.


The best part? It is free. The only purchase you would ever make is if you decide to download more filters, which could range anywhere from $0.99 to $6.99 depending on size of package, but it honestly comes with so many already, you’ll probably do just fine with the standard ones. 


Facetune – Available in iTunes App Store and Google Play
Lastly, the perfect selfie. Kim Kardashian loves to take them, and now you can too. You can also edit yours, somewhat similar as her. I did not pick the same application that she did, but I opted for the App called Facetune. Now, here comes a moment where my face was less than perfect, but for the sake of the post, I shall share. 

You can whiten your teeth, you can smooth out your skin, and for those people who want to look like they are a little less fluffy than they are, there’s something in here for that too. You will also notice with these shots, front facing cameras make photos grainy. My favorite feature, however, is the patch tool. I will get zits occasionally, and of course, that could leave you a little self conscious. 


You can use the patch tool to clear up the skin, you can de-focus corners of the photos, and you can use the smooth tool if you want to look extra silky. Though we always encourage you to be your best self and not to over-do it, this is a great tool to use, all for the teeny cost of $3.99. 

So, when applying this all to your daily life, you can add golden hues to your kids playing on the playground, add some effects and make them look like they were taken and edited by a more sophisticated system, or make yourself look gorgeous and glowing for your Match/Tinder profiles. The world is your oyster…er… your smartphone!

Happy Snapping! 


* This post was originally written for Magic 106.7 and Magic 96.3 by Amy Cooper. See the original post here:


Nude Modeling and Slut Shaming: ACRONYM's Thoughts

Hello All, 
I don't post on here all too often, because as a writer as well as a photographer, I have another platform for it. But as a photographer, this issue has continually plagued and concerned me. 

I consider myself having a side business. And with my side business comes a lot of women in the 18-25 range that are trying to build a portfolio of modeling. As I start working with someone who's trying to break onto the scene or trying to add to a portfolio, I tell them all to stay well rounded, and to not suck themselves into one genre. 

One of those realms of grey area is "nude modeling" or "lingerie."

Now, I find that as time goes on, more and more women are going the route of showing skin. I am not here to bash that, and I've photographed it myself, as you've probably seen. And there's a sense between showing, well, putting it indelicately, as "ratchet" photos, versus tasteful and classy photography with a lot of skin shown.  

There are many photographers out there, especially from my "crew" of photographer friends, who have mastered the art of showing the sexy side of women, without showing too much, and some push the envelope, but it still remains as one thing: art. 

There is a difference between art and trying to gain likes for attention. A lot of the women out there, fresh on the scene, they learn the difference between the two, one way or another. So I find that with most of the women I've come in contact with and try to work with know where I stand, and go down the right path. 

I'm here to say this, it's OKAY to be sexy. It's OKAY to want to do boudoir photography. And yes, sometimes that will land you in some backlash. But in the end, if you choose to do that, that is your decision as a model, and I plan to stand by you. 

I posted a screenshot of an article from Us Magazine today on my Instagram about Kendall Jenner. She did a shoot with Calvin Klein, where she's in nothing but a thong. The photo is classy, even more so, gorgeous. It's not a disgusting representation, in my opinion. Sure, it may not be everyone's cup of tea, but it made me think: Why is it okay for a woman in Hollywood, like Kendall allowed in society to do tasteful nude modeling, but yet a model in Detroit just getting started gets slut shamed? 

It is a local epidemic in the Detroit scene. A friend and photographer in Detroit, who I will leave nameless was privy to a slew of backlash from friends, family, and social media for his choice of photographing mostly nude or implied nude models. 

He said, "They told me that I only photograph sluts." 

How is that fair, when what he creates is art? This is all art, and it's the interpretation of the viewer how they take it. Yes, some are more modest as others. But I could cover a woman with paint two years ago, and shoot her topless, and nobody questioned it on my end. Only did her family members. 

Now, I post a shot of a woman topless with only under-boob showing, draped in an American flag, and she is posed, just as a Calvin Klein model. 

Image VIA PopSugar Eva Mendez and Jamie Dornan

Image VIA PopSugar
Eva Mendez and Jamie Dornan

My question is, what is the difference? Same general premise. Only one is local, and one is of a celebrity. It's a double standard.

Then in the male vs. female trend of celebs, it's fine if Justin Bieber goes bare butt on Instagram, but if Demi Lovato looks sexy on Instagram, she's slut shamed too? 

We need to stop berating women into thinking that their bodies are subject of shame. Now, I will say this much, I will not compromise my work or my art to make people feel comfortable. Someone said once that "art is supposed to make people feel uncomfortable" to consider it as effective. And sure, that might be a valuable theory. But on the flip side, I would never post something that I didn't stand behind as an artist. I may accept money sometimes for shoots, and I may post  things that you may not like, but I am first and foremost an artist, not a corporation. 

And with that message, I end this with one sentiment: Stop the slut shaming. 


Pintrest & Weddings: I Approve!

A buddy of mine and fellow photographer posted an article from PetaPixel in regards to Weddings and Pintrest – in the light of how it ruins the creative process of the shooter. Let me start by saying I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH PINTREST. [For those who don’t know, Pintrest is a site that has pictures and links for many things from nerdage, to photography, to travel tips, and many more creative and informational tips. You can “Pin” these ideas to a thing called a “Pintrest Board” to group them together.] I know some photographers will behave in the “I think I’m way more artistic than you and ‘Pintrest Photographers’ make my blood boil” fashion and will disagree with that statement and call me a fool, but when it comes to WEDDINGS, I find a Wedding Photography Pintrest board to be an asset. The article, entitled “How Pinterest Can Discourage the Creative Process for Photographers” starts to cite the usefulness of the tools, mainly that it helps the bride create the mental image of the wedding on all avenues, from color scheme to venues. It gives great ideas, and it does help narrow down what they wish to see, especially in the avenue of photos. Then it takes a turn and starts referencing the frustration that comes with a person wanting to replicate images and that it emotionally damages the ideas the photographer, and also makes them feel insecure about their final product. I find this to be pretty bogus. Most photographers are so self indulgent, that they can't admit to needing a creative generator. The only identifiable problem I have seen is when a Bride models her photography off of other previously shot photos by different studios, when the bride receives their photos, sometimes they are not identical, and they get frustrated or feel unsatisfied. Reason being, every photographer is different (for one) and for two, all the factors going into the shot are not always the same. This is completely understandable (and also unavoidable if you play your cards right) – but just for elaboration’s sake, here’s why:


Say for example, you’re in the countryside. You have a lot of background to work with. Say there’s water, and trees, and fields and beaches, and old & rustic barn doors. The sun is shining with just enough cloud cover that solar flares at a minimum and still creating a gorgeous glow. That’s going to lay a beautiful back drop for what you’re going to be working with. Now, in contrast, say you’re in the suburbs. It’s a gray day, maybe even sprinkly rain is in the mixture. The church is in a less than flattering area where there’s not much nature, nor is there any industrial back drop to make it look at least sort-of cool and intentional. You don’t have much time to go on a long adventure with your bride and groom, and if you’ve got to head more than fifteen minutes away from the site of the reception to get the shots you want, you’re going to run into time restriction issues. In contrast to that picturesque countryside, you’re going to end up with VERY different pictures. When establishing what kind of photography they would like for their wedding, make sure the Bride and Groom take that into consideration way ahead of time.


Say your Bride comes to you and says “this is what I want.” As a photographer, you’re supposed to try your very best to make that happen with the tools and locations you have. Key point: WITH THE TOOLS AND LOCATONS YOU HAVE. If you’re given strict assignments, like for example “You have an hour and a half for photos after the ceremony. You must take photos of X amount of people, within that time frame, and leave aside more time for the Bride and Groom to get pictures together in another designated location.” You abide by that as best as you can. If you’re not given ample amount of time, you work with what you have. Tip for future photogs – sit down with your bride and say “how much time do I have to work with?” This is going to save a lot of time and heartache later – and make sure that they know that catastrophes such as prolonged start times for the ceremony itself will not be your fault if it cuts into your photo time. You must work with what you have, and meet deadlines set by their schedule. Also, I very much insist you get a list of who’s being photographed and use it during the time to check them off piece by piece, so you don’t forget anyone and you have your bases covered. You are there to work with what you have, so make sure you have MORE than you need. 

Taking these two things into consideration, Pintrest can be a gift and a curse

GiftsSome fabulous shots taken by other photographers can give another photographer inspiration/help them create something they haven’t before:

As you all know, I’m a small operation. Small operation being me, my camera, and my equipment. I don’t have assistants. I don’t have accountants. I don’t have a million other things factoring into what I do. I just do it, and enjoy doing it. So if my Bride comes to me and says “Hey, I really like this shot, can we try this?” I will attempt it to the best of my ability, along with not being insulted (Photographer egos are another post I’d like to do at another time, as I feel this article I read was an emotional problem more than a legitimate one). Be sure though, that your Bride knows the facts: Sometimes the shot can’t be identical. You can attempt it, and do your very best, but sometimes it doesn’t always work. In my particular case, sometimes it does. Below is an example of my Pintrest experience with my most recent Bride & Groom for their engagement photos. The Bride told me about her Pintrest board (we’re also friends in real life) and she said “I’d like to attempt some of these.” She kept an open mind, and with a bit of creativity (and a lot of snow in our boots) here we are (First Shot Pintrest, Second Shot Acronym [Formerly A.C00P Photo&Design]):


A.C00P Photo&Design

Side note: ours was better, eat your… heart…. out :) 

CursesIf a Bride comes to you with a full on print out of her entire wedding Pintrest board and says “I want every single shot, identical on here.”:

Now, that’s insane, and probably sounds pretty Bridezilla-ish, right? Chances are, it’ happened to someone. But the bottom line? You, as a photographer need to communicate with your Bride. “This can be taken into consideration but is not a realistic request to replicate every photo and here’s why.” They hired you initially because they like YOUR work. They need to remember that, and you need to be as tactful and kind as possible to remind them of that and not radiate any cocky behavior (egos again!). Your “creativity and judgment is not being insulted” by their request to copy the board, but remind them that you have your own style and ideas and you will do your best to make their wedding what they want it to be, as best as you possibly can, with using your talent, AND some ideas they like. Remember, it is their day, not yours. And in turn, your client will need to remember the reality of the situation: They only have so much time with you – and in a chaotic moment such as a “messy suite while getting ready” isn’t going to create the same image as the “made bed, crisp sheets, done up Bride in a calm state holding a bouquet with full makeup and gorgeous hair.” (See photo in article).

The thing I took from this article, though (despite its emotional undertones) is something important. Being that it is the “Bride and Groom’s Day” – they need to remember one simple thing: be them. Do you want to re-create a photo identically from someone else’s wedding? Or would you like to build your own ideas based on the things you’ve seen and make the photo your own? Make it special, make it unique, and most of all, make it you. There’s nothing worse than getting back your photos and realizing they don’t depict you as a couple.

Weddings are stressful enough – you want to remember why you’re doing it in the end when you see those photos. And that’s what I’m here for – to capture that for you.